MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: [A retrospective study on the outcomes of the oncology, fertility and pregnancy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after undergoing the fertility-sparing treatments].
Author: Sun YX, Liu Q, Liu KJ, Li PQ, Hu ZJ.
Journal: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun 25; 51(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 27356480.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To explore the outcomes of the oncology, the fertility and pregnancy on patients with early-stage cervical cancer after undergoing fertility-sparing treatments, and to investigate its value on clinical treatment. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with cervical cancer (stage Ⅰa2-Ⅰb1) who had undergone the fertility- sparing treatments in Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University from February 2010 to September 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Surgical procedures included transvaginal cervical cold knife conization (CKC) + laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) or total laparoscopic uterine cervix extensive resection (RT; contains PLD); 48 patients with early cervical cancer under going laparoscopic uterine extensive resection (RH; contains PLD) by the same group of physicians in the same period were chosen as the control group. The perioperative related indicators, postoperative specimen examination, pregnancies after surgery and postoperative tumor follow- up results were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: (1) Among these 29 patients in the study group, 26 cases were underwent the fertility-sparing surgery quick frozen pathological examinations were positive in 3 cases, which underwent total laparoscopic RT eventually. (2) The perioperative related indicators: compared with the study group and the control group, the operation time [(182±21), (147±24) minutes, respectively] has significant difference (t=6.563, P<0.01). There were no significant difference (P> 0.05) in intra-operative blood loss [(102±26), (99±34) ml], postoperative aerofluxus time [(1.3±0.4), (1.1±0.9) days], the average length of hospital stay [(11.2±2.1), (10.6±3.5) days], rate of urine retention [10%(3/29), 10%(5/48)] and rate of postoperative infection [3% (1/29), 2%(1/48)]. (3)Postoperative specimen examination: compared with the study group and the control group, there were no significant difference (P>0.05) innumber of removed lymphatic nodes (23.4±4.1, 22.8±3.9), length of cardinal ligament [(2.9±0.5), (3.0±0.6) cm], lengthof uterosacral ligament [(2.6±0.7), (2.8±0.4) cm], length of removed vaginal [(3.4±0.3), (3.5±0.3) cm]. (4) Pregnancies after surgery and postoperative tumor follow-up results: in the study group, only 14 patients had fertility requirement after treatments. Pregnancies occurred in 5 women (5/14), which included1 case of full-term labor, 1 case of preterm labor, and 3 cases of spontaneous abortion. The Average follow-up time in postoperative patients of the study group and control group was 29.4, and 30.2 months respectively. In follow- up period, compare with study group and the control group, there was no significant difference (χ(2)=0.004, P> 0.05) in the recurrence rate [4% (1/26), 4% (2/48)]. CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing surgery of early-stage cervical cancer is safe but the outcome of the fertility and pregnancy is still need toimprove.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]