These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Clinical features of irritable bowel syndrome with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and a preliminary study of effectiveness of Rifaximin].
    Author: Liu ZJ, Wei H, Duan LP, Zhu SW, Zhang L, Wang K.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun 28; 96(24):1896-902. PubMed ID: 27373356.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical features of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) patients detected by hydrogen and methane in lactulose breath test (LBT), and to study the effects of rifaximin in IBS-D patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IBS-D who met Rome Ⅲ criteria, and gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled from March 2015 to January 2016 in Peking University Third Hospital. All the ISB-D patients underwent LBT to detect the prevalence of SIBO. The clinical and LBT features of IBS with SIBO (IBS-P group) and without SIBO (IBS-N group) were analyzed. The effects of rifaximin therapy (0.4 g, twice per day for 4 weeks) in IBS-D patients were evaluated by comparing changes in clinical features and LBT results after treatment. RESULTS: (1) Eighty-four IBS-D patients and 22 healthy controls were enrolled. The prevalence of SIBO in IBS-D patients was 41.67% (35/84), with 27 (77.14%) only hydrogen-positive, 5 (14.29%) methane-positive, and 3 (8.57%) both methane- and hydrogen-positive. (2) The body mass index (BMI) in the IBS-P group was lower than in the IBS-N group [(21.61±0.57) vs (23.44±0.54) kg/m(2,) P<0.05], the maximum stool frequency was also less than in the IBS-N group [(3.85±0.23) vs (4.88±0.35) times/day, P<0.05]. (3) No significant difference was found in oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) among IBS-P, IBS-N and healthy controls. The hydrogen concentration in small intestinal and colonic sections in breath of the IBS-P group was higher than that of both healthy controls and the IBS-N group, while methane concentration in small intestinal and colonic sections (160 min) was higher than that of the IBS-N group (all P<0.05). (4) There was no linear relationship between mean hydrogen and methane concentrations in LBT among the IBS-P, the IBS-N and healthy control groups (all r<0.35, P>0.05). (5) Totally 13 IBS-P patients received rifaximin therapy, in whom the symptoms of abdomen pain, bloating, fecal consistency, stool frequency, and stool satisfactory were significantly improved after treatment (all P<0.05); 8 IBS-N patients received rifaximin therapy, in whom fecal consistency, stool frequency, and satisfactory were significantly improved (all P<0.05). (6) And 5/13 of the IBS-P patients receiving rifaximin presented negative LBT results after rifaximin therapy, with lower hydrogen concentration at all the time points, especially in colonic section (120 min) [(34.54±7.32) ×10(-6) vs (52.23±9.40) ×10(-6,) P<0.05] and lower methane concentration especially in small intestinal section (80 min) [(8.54±0.95) ×10(-6) vs (11.31±0.94) ×10(-6,) P<0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: About 41.67% of the IBS-D patients meeting Rome Ⅲ criteria have SIBO, which can be better screened by combining hydrogen and methane in LBT compared with only hydrogen in LBT. SIBO can affect nutritional status in IBS-D patients. Rifaximin can improve the systematic symptoms of IBS-D patients with SIBO, also reduce hydrogen and methane concentration in breath, while only improving diarrhea in IBS-D patients without SIBO. Some differences in gut microbiota may exist between IBS-D with and without SIBO.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]