These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interpretation of elevated postmortem serum concentrations of digoxin in infants and children.
    Author: Koren G, Beatie D, Soldin S, Einerson TR, MacLeod S.
    Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Jul; 113(7):758-61. PubMed ID: 2742457.
    Abstract:
    The relationship between excessive postmortem digoxin concentrations (greater than 6.4 nmol/L) and administered dose, and antemortem levels and time of sampling after death were determined in 27 digitalized children who died in our hospital between March 24, 1981 and September 1, 1983. In all 27 cases, postmortem concentrations were higher than antemortem levels (9.5 +/- 2.5 nmol/L and 3.12 +/- 1.72 nmol/L, respectively). In none of these patients was there clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of digitalis toxicity. There was a significant correlation between antemortem and postmortem determinations, and between time of sampling after death and postmortem concentration. Positive correlation existed between antemortem or postmortem concentrations and dose per kilogram. The degree of elevation in digoxin levels was uniform in most cases, and the likelihood of elevation falling in the range 3.5 to 7.0 nmol/L was 66%. If the estimated concentration of digoxin at the time of death was taken as baseline, in 75% of cases the subsequent elevation was between 5.3 and 8.3 nmol/L (mean, 6.5 +/- 1.1 nmol/L). Digoxin concentrations measured in newborn infants not receiving digoxin were significantly higher after death (1.5 +/- 0.3 nmol/L) than in age-matched living infants not receiving digoxin (0.5 +/- 0.3 nmol/L). These data indicate that the size of antemortem dose, the time of sampling after death, and existence of endogenous digoxinlike factors affect postmortem readings of digoxin levels. Consequently, excessive postmortem determinations cannot be directly interpreted as proof of toxic antemortem levels.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]