These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The MEEK technique: 10-year experience at a tertiary burn centre.
    Author: Almodumeegh A, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Rubenbauer J, Hadjipanayi E, Broer PN.
    Journal: Int Wound J; 2017 Aug; 14(4):601-605. PubMed ID: 27489175.
    Abstract:
    Extensive full-thickness burns pose a great challenge to the burn surgeon. Lack of autograft donor sites is an important limiting factor to achieving wound closure. To overcome this problem, various methods of treatment have been suggested in the past, including the MEEK technique. This study was carried out at the Bogenhausen Hospital Burn Unit, Munich, Germany from 2006 to 2015. There were a total of 148 skin grafting operations. The modified MEEK technique was performed on 67 patients. Patients included 34 males and 33 females, with an average age of 39·6 years. The mean percentage body surface burned was 65%, and full-thickness injury occurred in 52%. The mean area graft per procedure was 20%. The viability of the graft as assessed between the 7th and 10th day was generally in the range of 60-90%. The average number of operations required was 2·21. The mean length of stay was 27 days. Infection was documented in five patients, and seven deaths occurred. The mean follow-up was 3·2 years. When faced with large surface area burns and limited donor sites, the MEEK technique is a satisfactory method for coverage.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]