These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Validating a robust double-quantum-filtered (1) H MRS lactate measurement method in high-grade brain tumours.
    Author: Payne GS, Harris LM, Cairns GS, Messiou C, deSouza NM, Macdonald A, Saran F, Leach MO.
    Journal: NMR Biomed; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1420-6. PubMed ID: 27514007.
    Abstract:
    (1) H MRS measurements of lactate are often confounded by overlapping lipid signals. Double-quantum (DQ) filtering eliminates lipid signals and permits single-shot measurements, which avoid subtraction artefacts in moving tissues. This study evaluated a single-voxel-localized DQ filtering method qualitatively and quantitatively for measuring lactate concentrations in the presence of lipid, using high-grade brain tumours in which the results could be compared with standard acquisition as a reference. Paired standard acquisition and DQ-filtered (1) H MR spectra were acquired at 3T from patients receiving treatment for glioblastoma, using fLASER (localization by adiabatic selective refocusing using frequency offset corrected inversion pulses) single-voxel localization. Data were acquired from 2 × 2 × 2 cm(3) voxels, with a repetition time of 1 s and 128 averages (standard acquisition) or 256 averages (DQ-filtered acquisition), requiring 2.15 and 4.3 min respectively. Of 37 evaluated data pairs, 20 cases (54%) had measureable lactate (fitted Cramér-Rao lower bounds ≤ 20%) in either the DQ-filtered or the standard acquisition spectra. The measured DQ-filtered lactate signal was consistently downfield of lipid (1.33 ± 0.03 ppm vs 1.22 ± 0.08 ppm; p = 0.002), showing that it was not caused by lipid breakthrough, and that it matched the lactate signal seen in standard measurements (1.36 ± 0.02 ppm). In the absence of lipid, similar lactate concentrations were measured by the two methods (mean ratio DQ filtered/standard acquisition = 1.10 ± 0.21). In 7/20 cases with measurable lactate, signal was not measureable in the standard acquisition owing to lipid overlap but was quantified in the DQ-filtered acquisition. Conversely, lactate was undetected in seven DQ-filtered acquisitions but visible using the standard acquisition. In conclusion, the DQ filtering method has proven robust in eliminating lipid and permits uncontaminated measurement of lactate. This is important validation prior to use in tissues outside the brain, which contain large amounts of lipid and which are often susceptible to motion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]