These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Mineralocorticoid receptor function in depressed patients and healthy individuals.
    Author: Hinkelmann K, Hellmann-Regen J, Wingenfeld K, Kuehl LK, Mews M, Fleischer J, Heuser I, Otte C.
    Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2016 Nov 03; 71():183-8. PubMed ID: 27519144.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown disturbed glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in depressed patients. In contrast, only few studies targeted mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) function with inconclusive results. We examined the effects of the MR antagonist spironolactone on cortisol secretion in depressed patients and healthy individuals. METHODS: Forty-eight unmedicated depressed patients (mean age 41.6years) and 45 age- and sex-matched healthy participants (40.7years) received the MR antagonist spironolactone (300mg) or placebo with three days apart in a randomized, double-blind, within-subject cross-over design. We measured salivary cortisol before ingestion of study medication (baseline) as well as +60min, +90min, +120min, +150min and 180min after baseline. RESULTS: Repeated-measures ANOVA for area under the curve (AUCg) cortisol revealed a treatment effect with higher cortisol after spironolactone and a treatment by group interaction. Post-hoc analyses revealed higher cortisol in depressed patients compared to healthy participants in the placebo condition. In the spironolactone condition, the cortisol levels were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially, impaired MR or GR signaling could be responsible for higher cortisol levels in depressed patients in the placebo condition. However, after MR blockade that increased cortisol secretion across groups leading to higher GR occupation, we found no differences between depressed patients and healthy controls. Thus, our results argue for depression-associated alterations in MR signaling rather than disturbed GR-mediated feedback inhibition.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]