These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. Author: Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Koenker RM, Tillotson CL, Pearsen KD, Hill JW, Velaj RH. Journal: Invest Radiol; 1989 Jul; 24(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 2753645. Abstract: We studied the detectability of mineralized and non-mineralized simulated pulmonary nodules with dual energy digital radiography. "Soft tissue" and "bone" images (pixel size = 0.2 mm, 10 bits deep) were obtained with subtraction image processing after a single simultaneous exposure (100 kVp, 8 mAs, 17 mR skin exposure dose) of two storage phosphors with an interleaved 0.9 mm copper wafer. Three classes of paraffin-based nodules (0.5 to 3.0 cm) of varying mineral concentration (0, 120 and 190 mg/cm3 K2HPO4) were randomly positioned on the chest wall of two healthy volunteers to simulate calcified and non-calcified nodules. The average receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area of six readers (n = 2880 observations) showed that digital "bone" images (ROC area: 0.77 +/- 0.03) were significantly better (P less than 0.04) than conventional radiographs (OC Film, Lanex medium screens, 141 kVp, 19 mR skin exposure dose) (ROC area: 0.71 +/- 0.05) in detecting calcification in nodules. The unsubtracted digital images of lower kilovoltage were not superior to the 141 kVp conventional radiographs in a subgroup of two readers (ROC area: 0.73 +/- 0.02). Digital "soft tissue" images were equivalent to conventional chest radiographs in detecting soft tissue pulmonary nodules (ROC areas: 0.92 +/- 0.04 and 0.92 +/- 0.05, respectively.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]