These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Baseline Predictors of Vitreomacular Adhesion/Traction Resolution Following an Intravitreal Injection of Ocriplasmin.
    Author: Jackson TL, Regillo CD, Girach A, Dugel PU, MIVI-TRUST Study Group.
    Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2016 Aug 01; 47(8):716-23. PubMed ID: 27548448.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predicting response to ocriplasmin (Jetrea; ThromboGenics, Iselin, NJ) response in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combined analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked trials of intravitreal ocriplasmin 125 µg injection versus placebo. Patients had vitreomacular traction with or without a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing treatment response (complete VMA release [day 28] and non-surgical FTMH closure [month 6]). RESULTS: Younger age, presence of FTMH (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.7), VMA diameter of 1,500 µm or less (OR = 4.9; 95% CI, 2.0-12.4), phakic lens status (OR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.2), and absence of epiretinal membrane (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 2.2-7.9) predicted VMA resolution. FTMHs with apical diameter of 250 µm or less were more likely to close than larger holes (58.3% vs. 24.6%; P = .013). Both FTMH size groups had significantly greater chance of VMA resolution and FTMH closure versus controls. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin is most effective in younger patients with focal VMA and without an epiretinal membrane. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:716-723.].
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]