These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Standardization of 99mTechnetium pyrophosphate imaging methodology to diagnose TTR cardiac amyloidosis.
    Author: Bokhari S, Morgenstern R, Weinberg R, Kinkhabwala M, Panagiotou D, Castano A, DeLuca A, Kontak A, Jin Z, Maurer MS.
    Journal: J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):181-190. PubMed ID: 27580616.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Technetium pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) imaging to diagnose transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) has been increasingly utilized. The objective of this study is to provide a standardized 99mTc-PYP imaging protocol to diagnose ATTR-CA. METHODS: 104 scans from 45 subjects with biopsy-proven ATTR-CA or light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL) were assessed. Multiple scans were obtained using different counts (750 vs 2000 K), times to acquisition (1 vs 2 to 4 hours), processing matrix (256 vs 128), and 99mTc-PYP dose. Image quality and extracardiac activity was assessed. Quantitative methods using heart-to-contralateral ratios (H/CL) and a visual semiquantitative scale were used to diagnose ATTR-CA.19 The correlation between H/CL ratios and reproducibility of semiquantitative visual scores, acquired using various imaging parameters, were evaluated. RESULTS: All imaging parameters had good to excellent image quality. 750 vs 2000 K counts, 1 hour acquisition and 256 matrix, had lower extracardiac activity (P = .00018). 10 mCi of 99mTc-PYP v. higher doses showed excellent image quality and less extracardiac activity (P = .0015). Correlation of H/CL ratios was strong (r ≥ 0.92) and reproducibility of semiquantitative visual scores was high (Kappa = 95%). CONCLUSION: An imaging protocol using 750 K counts, 10 mCi of 99mTc-PYP, and a 256 matrix was chosen as the standardized imaging protocol since it provided the shortest overall study time (1 vs 2 to 4 hours) and lowest radiation exposure (3 vs 8 to 10 mSv).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]