These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of Continuous Wave and Rapid Scan X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Irradiated Clipped Fingernails. Author: Elajaili H, McPeak J, Romanyukha A, Aggarwal P, Eaton SS, Eaton GR. Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 172(1-3):133-138. PubMed ID: 27590467. Abstract: X-band rapid scan electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measures the free radicals in irradiated clipped fingernails with higher signal-to-noise (S/N) and lower standard deviation of the signal amplitude for replicate measurements than does conventional continuous wave (CW) EPR in the same measurement time. For a clipped fingernail sample irradiated to 10 Gy and data acquisition time of 30 s with B1 = 8.5 μT, the S/N for rapid scan is >2000 for the absorption spectrum and 1200 for the corresponding first derivative. The standard deviation for replicate measurements of signal amplitude is ~1%. For CW spectra, the S/N depends on the modulation amplitude. The CW signal has a first derivative peak-to-peak linewidth of 0.95 mT. For 30 s of CW acquisition time, the S/N was 30 for a conservative modulation amplitude of 0.2 mT and B1 of 2.3 μT or 90 for a modulation amplitude of 0.4 mT and B1 of 3.2 μT, which resulted in standard deviations of replicate measurements of 5% or 2%, respectively.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]