These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Time-efficient measurement of multi-phase arterial spin labeling MR signal in white matter.
    Author: Zhang X, Ronen I, Kan HE, Teeuwisse WM, van Osch MJ.
    Journal: NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1519-1525. PubMed ID: 27594277.
    Abstract:
    White matter (WM) perfusion has great potential as a physiological biomarker in many neurological diseases. Although it has been demonstrated previously that arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) enables the detection of the perfusion-weighted signal in most voxels in WM, studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in WM by ASL-MRI are relatively scarce because of its particular challenges, such as significantly lower perfusion and longer arterial transit times relative to gray matter (GM). Recently, ASL with a spectroscopic readout has been proposed to enhance the sensitivity for the measurement of WM perfusion. However, this approach suffers from long acquisition times, especially when acquiring multi-phase ASL datasets to improve CBF quantification. Furthermore, the potential increase in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by spectroscopic readout compared with echo planar imaging (EPI) readout has not been proven experimentally. In this study, we propose the use of time-encoded pseudo-continuous ASL (te-pCASL) with single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) readout to quantify WM cerebral perfusion in a more time-efficient manner. Results are compared with te-pCASL with a conventional EPI readout for both WM and GM perfusion measurements. Perfusion measurements by te-pCASL PRESS and conventional EPI showed no significant difference for quantitative WM CBF values (Student's t-test, p = 0.19) or temporal SNR (p = 0.33 and p = 0.81 for GM and WM, respectively), whereas GM CBF values (p = 0.016) were higher using PRESS than EPI readout. WM CBF values were found to be 18.2 ± 7.6 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) and 12.5 ± 5.5 mL/100 g/min (EPI), whereas GM CBF values were found to be 77.1 ± 11.2 mL/100 g/min (PRESS) and 53.6 ± 9.6 mL/100 g/min (EPI). This study demonstrates the feasibility of te-pCASL PRESS for the quantification of WM perfusion changes in a highly time-efficient manner, but it does not result in improved temporal SNR, as does traditional te-pCASL EPI, which remains the preferred option because of its flexibility in use.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]