These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Performance of Lung Ultrasound in Detecting Peri-Operative Atelectasis after General Anesthesia.
    Author: Yu X, Zhai Z, Zhao Y, Zhu Z, Tong J, Yan J, Ouyang W.
    Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2775-2784. PubMed ID: 27639431.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in detecting post-operative atelectasis in adult patients under general anesthesia. Forty-six patients without pulmonary comorbidities who were scheduled for elective neurosurgery were enrolled in the study. A total of 552 pairs of LUS clips and thoracic computed tomography (CT) images were ultimately analyzed to determine the presence of atelectasis in 12 prescribed lung regions. The accuracy of LUS in detecting peri-operative atelectasis was evaluated with thoracic CT as gold standard. Levels of agreement between the two observers for LUS and the two observers for thoracic CT were analyzed using the κ reliability test. The quantitative correlation between LUS scores of aeration and the volumetric data of atelectasis in thoracic CT were further evaluated. LUS had reliable performance in post-operative atelectasis, with a sensitivity of 87.7%, specificity of 92.1% and diagnostic accuracy of 90.8%. The levels of agreement between the two observers for LUS and for thoracic CT were both satisfactory, with κ coefficients of 0.87 (p < 0.0001) and 0.93 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In patients in the supine position, LUS scores were highly correlated with the atelectasis volume of CT (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001). Thus, LUS provides a fast, reliable and radiation-free method to identify peri-operative atelectasis in adults.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]