These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of experience on procedure steps, safety, and functional results in edge to edge mitral valve repair-a single center study.
    Author: Hamm K, Zacher M, Hautmann M, Gietzen F, Halbfass P, Kerber S, Diegeler A, Schieffer B, Barth S.
    Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug 01; 90(2):313-320. PubMed ID: 27649934.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the effects of experience on the Mitraclip® procedure steps as well as procedure safety and functional results. BACKGROUND: MR has proven deleterious in heart failure. Mitraclip® therapy evolved an important option in patients with severely reduced left ventricular function (LVEF). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 126 consecutive patients were grouped in three groups and investigated in a prospective observational study. We evaluated the duration of procedural steps, safety endpoints, and functional results. RESULTS: The median logistic EuroScore was 32% (7-40%). Ninety-five percent of patients were in NYHA-stage ≥III and 51% had a LVEF <30%. Groups were homogeneous as to their baseline NYHA status and right heart catheterization data. Echocardiography data are comparable, albeit with a decreasing effective regurgitant orifice area (0.44 ± 0.21 group I vs. 0.34 ± 0.22 group III, P = 0.02). Frailty was less frequent and baseline 6 min walking test results improved from group I to group III. Duration of a first clip placement decreased from 106 ± 50 to 50 ± 21 min (P < 0.001). Total procedure time decreased from 221 ± 70 to 144 ± 68 (P < 0.001). The number of clips implanted increased from 66 to 79 (P = 0.02). MitraClip® implantation was effective in either group but the combined safety endpoint was reached less frequent in group III (P = 0.01). There was no difference in MACCE rate, 30 day- or intrahospital-mortality between groups. CONCLUSION: Safety and duration of procedure steps improved substantially with experience. MR reduction was sustained from the beginning without further improvement. Patient selection is a key factor for success. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]