MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Validation of the vessel-specific leads (VSLs) for detection of acute ischemia on a dataset with non-ischemic ST-segment deviation.
Author: Wang JJ, Pahlm O, Wagner GS, Warren JW, Horáček BM, Sapp JL.
Journal: J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(6):800-806. PubMed ID: 27662776.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Existing criteria recommended by ACC/ESC for identifying patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from the 12-lead ECG perform with high specificity (SP) but low sensitivity (SE). In our previous studies, we found that the SE of acute ischemia detection can be markedly improved without any loss of SP by calculating, from the 12-lead ECG, ST deviation in 3 "optimal" vessel-specific leads (VSLs). To further validate the method, we evaluated the SP performance using a dataset with non-ischemic ST-segment changes. METHODS: 12-lead ECGs of 100 patients (75 males/25 females, age range 12-83years, average age 52years) were retrieved from a centralized ECG management system at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. These ECGs were chosen to represent five subgroups with various causes of pathological ST deviation, other than acute coronary occlusion: a) ventricular preexcitation (n=12), b) acute pericarditis (n=26), c) early repolarization syndrome (ERS) (n=14), d) left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with "strain" (n=26), and e) left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=22). ECGs with inadequate signal quality, heart rate exceeding 120bpm and/or atrial flutter were not selected for this study population. Both STEMI criteria and VSLs criteria with and without a new augmented LVH-specific derived lead were tested. SP, calculated for each subgroup and combined, was used as the performance measure for comparison. RESULTS: SP test results for the STEMI criteria vs. the VSLs method without the augmented LVH lead were 100% vs. 92%, 4% vs. 88%, 29% vs. 100%, 100% vs. 77%, and 64% vs. 68% for the five subgroups with preexcitation, pericarditis, ERS, LVH, and LBBB, respectively. For the whole group, SP was 57% for the STEMI criteria and 83% for the VSLs criteria; this improvement was statistically significant (p<0.001). With the augmented LVH lead, SP for the VSLs improved from 77% to 96% for the LVH subgroup and SP for the other subgroups remained unchanged. For the whole study group, SP improved from 83% to 88%. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, we conclude that the VSLs criteria are not only more sensitive in detecting acute ischemia but also more specific in recognizing patients with non-ischemic ST deviation than the existing STEMI criteria. This finding needs to be further corroborated on a larger patient population with AMI prevalence typical of the population presenting to the emergency room.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]