MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade and Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Author: Hiremath S, Fergusson DA, Fergusson N, Bennett A, Knoll GA.
Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 2017 Jan; 69(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 27712852.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system [RAS] blockade has been established as the cornerstone of therapy in the general population, and especially in chronic kidney disease. However, its efficacy in the kidney transplant population remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE (1966 to November 2015), Embase (1980 to November 2015), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter 2015), as well as a PubMed search for recent nonindexed citations. SETTINGS & POPULATION: Adult kidney transplant recipients. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials, with follow-up of 1 year or longer and reporting clinical outcomes of interest. INTERVENTION: RAS blockade (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) versus placebo, active comparator, or standard of care. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality, all-cause transplant failure, and doubling of serum creatinine level. RESULTS: 8 trials (1,502 participants) were included in the systematic review. RAS blockade did not significantly alter all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.62-1.51), transplant failure (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49-1.18), or creatinine level doubling (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.51-1.39) compared to the control group. This result was robust across the subgroups of interest (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker intervention, follow up ≥ 1 year, and baseline proteinuria as an inclusion criterion). There was significantly higher risk for hyperkalemia with RAS blockade (RR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.53-3.90). There was no statistical heterogeneity in any of these pooled analyses. LIMITATIONS: Relatively smaller number of events (overall, 71 deaths and 72 transplant failures among 8 trials) and relatively short follow-up (only 2 trials > 5 years). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis neither supports nor refutes the hypothesis that RAS blockade improves clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. A trial with more than 10,000 patients would be needed to definitively answer whether RAS blockade reduces transplant loss in this population. In the meantime, clinicians should weigh the risks and benefits of using these medications with their patients on a case-by-case basis.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]