These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Reliability and construct validity of the OPD-CA axes: structure and prerequisites for treatment].
    Author: Fliedl R, Katzenschläger P.
    Journal: Neuropsychiatr; 2016 Sep; 30(3):151-157. PubMed ID: 27718052.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD-CA) for children and adolescents with the modified version (OPD-CA-2) focusing on the mainly unchanged treatment conditions and the redesigned structure axis. METHODS: The patient sample consisted 371 inpatient children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders from 3 to 18 years. OPD-CA and OPD-CA-2 diagnostics were routinely performed by OPD-experienced raters. Statistical calculation included Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The OPD-CA-2 structure axis showed very good internal consistency (reliability) compared to the OPD-CA. We found satisfactorily good values for the treatment conditions with slightly higher average scores in the OPD-CA-2. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in two models where the items on the OPD-CA-2 structure axis were stronger correlated than those of the OPD-CA. CONCLUSION: The OPD-CA-2 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing treatment conditions and psychic structure in children and adolescents. The reorganization of the structure axis and the treatment conditions in the OPD-CA-2 resulted in a measurable improvement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]