These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon by 99mTc-pertechnetate hand perfusion scintigraphy: a pilot study.
    Author: Pavlov-Dolijanovic S, Petrovic N, Vujasinovic Stupar N, Damjanov N, Radunovic G, Babic D, Sobic-Saranovic D, Artiko V.
    Journal: Rheumatol Int; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1683-1688. PubMed ID: 27783160.
    Abstract:
    We assess the usefulness of 99mTc-pertechnetate hand perfusion scintigraphy in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). The study population consisted of 18 patients with primary RP, 25 patients with secondary RP within systemic sclerosis (SSc), and ten healthy individuals. Gamma camera dynamic first-pass study during the first 60 s and a static scintigraphy after 5 min were recorded following a bolus injection of 99mTc-pertechnetate via a cubital vein. Regions of interest were drawn on the summed images around the fingers and the palmar region. The fingers-to-palm ratios were then calculated. The mean fingers-to-palm ratio for dynamic study (blood flow) was 0.58 ± 0.19 for the healthy group, 0.45 ± 0.18 for the primary RP, and 0.43 ± 0.21 for the SSc patients. The mean fingers-to-palm ratio for static study (blood pool) was 0.44 ± 0.06 for the healthy group, 0.42 ± 0.06 for the primary RP, and 0.36 ± 0.07 for the SSc patients. Analysis of variance showed these differences to be significant (p = 0.039 from blood flow and p = 0.004 from blood pool). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 60% when using cutoff values of 0.40 for blood flow and sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 70% when using cutoff values of 0.37 for blood pool. Our method is able to differentiate between patients with normal and those with abnormal microcirculation of the hands. Dynamic study separates the healthy subjects from patients with RP, while static study separates primary from secondary RP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]