These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Validation of varus stress radiographs for anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner knee injuries: A biomechanical study. Author: McDonald LS, Waltz RA, Carney JR, Dewing CB, Lynch JR, Asher DB, Schuett DJ, LeClere LE. Journal: Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1064-1068. PubMed ID: 27806878. Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency on the radiographic varus stress test, and to provide reference data for the increase in lateral compartment opening under varus stress for a combined ACL and PLC injury. METHODS: Ten cadaveric lower extremities were fixed to a jig in 20° of knee flexion. Twelve Newton-meter (Nm) and clinician-applied varus loads were tested, first with intact knee ligaments, followed by sequential sectioning of the ACL, fibular collateral ligament (FCL), popliteus tendon and the popliteofibular ligament (PFL). Lateral compartment opening was measured after each sequential sectioning. RESULTS: Maximum increase in lateral compartment opening for an isolated ACL deficient knee was 1.06mm with mean increase of 0.52mm (p=0.021) for the clinician-applied load. Mean increase in lateral compartment opening in an ACL and FCL deficient knee compared to the intact knee was 1.48mm (p<0.005) and 1.99mm (p<0.005) for the 12-Nm and clinician-applied loads, respectively, increasing to 1.94mm (p<0.005) and 2.68mm (p<0.005) with sectioning of the ACL and all PLC structures. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency contributes to lateral compartment opening on varus stress radiographs though not sufficiently to confound previously established standards for lateral ligament knee injuries. We did not demonstrate the same magnitude of lateral compartment opening with sectioning of the PLC structures as previously reported, questioning the reproducibility of varus stress radiographic testing among institutions. Clinicians are cautioned against making surgical decisions based solely on current standards for radiographic stress examinations.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]