These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Posterior Fossa Craniectomy with Endovascular Therapy of Giant Fusiform Basilar Artery Aneurysms: A New Approach to Consider? Author: Amelot A, Smajda S, Terrier LM, Redjem H, Simonneau A, Bekaert O, Piotin M, Lot G, Chauvet D. Journal: World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():104-112. PubMed ID: 27810459. Abstract: BACKGROUND: The prognosis of unruptured giant basilar artery (BA) aneurysms is very poor. No treatment has shown efficacy in survival. This pilot case-control study examines the overall survival (OS) benefit of combined surgical and endovascular management of giant BA aneurysms. METHODS: Combined treatment including posterior fossa craniectomy followed by endovascular treatment was performed in 3 patients with giant BA aneurysms. OS of the 3 patients was compared with a control group of 6 patients (ratio 1:2) treated with the endovascular procedure only. RESULTS: The mean survival time was 32.6 months in the craniectomy group (SD 9.01, 95% confidence interval [14.9, 50.3]) and 3.5 months in the control group (SD = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [0.001, 7.6]; Mantel-Cox test P < 0.04). At mean follow-up of 36.5 months (SD 10.2), 2 of 3 patients had a favorable outcome with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5. Univariate analysis determined that women had a statistically higher OS than men (33.7 months vs. 3.058 months for men; log-rank test P = 0.011). A similar outcome was obtained in the presence of a circulating posterior communicating artery (P = 0.03) and in the presence of an endovascular right vertebral artery occlusion (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that preventive posterior fossa craniectomy increases significantly OS of patients with giant BA aneurysms.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]