These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Knee extensors neuromuscular fatigue changes the corticospinal pathway excitability in biceps brachii muscle. Author: Aboodarda SJ, Šambaher N, Millet GY, Behm DG. Journal: Neuroscience; 2017 Jan 06; 340():477-486. PubMed ID: 27826108. Abstract: Equivocal evidence indicates that high-intensity muscle contractions can affect the corticospinal responses in muscles not directly involved in the task. In the present study, the responsiveness of corticomotor pathway innervating non-dominant biceps brachii was measured in eleven healthy participants before and after: (i) two 100-s isometric unilateral knee extension maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) on dominant leg (FATIGUE) and (ii) rest (CONTROL). Transcranial magnetic stimulation, transmastoid electrical and brachial plexus electrical stimulation were used to evoke motor evoked potential (MEP), cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) and compound muscle action potential (Mmax) in biceps brachii muscle. The three stimuli were elicited at 2, 3.5 and 5s while participants were performing 6-s elbow flexion contractions at 100, 50, and 5% of MVC interspersed with 10-s rest. The results demonstrated opposing behaviors of MEP responses at 100% (23% higher, p=0.08) and 5% MVC (34% lower, p=0.019) following FATIGUE compared to CONTROL. Similarly, MEP·CMEP-1 ratio changes indicated that the supraspinal motor response was significantly higher during 100% (42%, p=0.027) but lower during 5% MVC (28%, p=0.009) following FATIGUE. Yet, the elbow flexor MVC force did not exhibit any difference between FATIGUE and CONTROL conditions. These results suggest that the upper limb muscles' corticomotor pathway responsiveness recorded during voluntary contractions were modulated by lower limbs fatiguing contractions and this modulation depends on the force produced during testing, i.e. level of central motor drive. However, these changes have little effect on upper limb muscle maximal performance.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]