These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Duodeno-duodenostomy or duodeno-jejunostomy for duodenal atresia: is one repair better than the other?
    Author: Zani A, Yeh JB, King SK, Chiu PP, Wales PW.
    Journal: Pediatr Surg Int; 2017 Feb; 33(2):245-248. PubMed ID: 27858187.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The surgical management of neonates with duodenal atresia (DA) involves re-establishment of intestinal continuity, either by duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) or by duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ). Although the majority of pediatric surgeons perform DD repair preferentially, we aimed to analyze the outcome of DA neonates treated with either surgical technique. METHODS: Following ethical approval (REB:1000047737), we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent DA repair between 2004 and 2014. Patients with associated esophageal/intestinal atresias and/or anorectal malformations were excluded. Outcome measures included demographics (gender, gestational age, and birth weight), length of mechanical ventilation, time to first and full feed, length of hospital admission, weight at discharge (z-scores), and postoperative complications (anastomotic stricture/leak, adhesive obstruction, and need for re-laparotomy). Both DD and DJ groups were compared using parametric or non-parametric tests, with data presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: During the study period, 92 neonates met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 (51%) had DD and 45 (49%) DJ repair. All procedures were performed open, apart from one laparoscopic DJ. Overall, DD and DJ groups had similar demographics. Likewise, we found no differences between the two groups for length of ventilation (p = 0.6), time to first feed (p = 0.5), time to full feed (p = 0.4), length of admission (p = 0.6), prokinetic use (p = 0.5), nor weight at discharge (p = 0.1). When the 30/92 (33%) patients with trisomy-21 (DD = 16, DJ = 14) were excluded from analysis, the groups still had similar weight at discharge (p = 0.2). Postoperative complication rate was not different between the two groups. One patient per group died, due to respiratory failure (DD) and sepsis (DJ). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in neonates with duodenal atresia, duodeno-duodenostomy and duodeno-jejunostomy have similar outcomes. These findings are relevant for surgeons who repair duodenal atresia laparoscopically, as duodeno-jejunostomy had equal clinical outcomes and may be easier to perform.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]