These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
    Author: Johnson WB, Vatterott PJ, Peterson MA, Bagwe S, Underwood RD, Bank AJ, Gage RM, Ramza B, Foreman BW, Splett V, Haddad T, Gillberg JM, Ghosh S.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 27871987.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Electrical heterogeneity (EH) during cardiac resynchronization therapy may vary with different left ventricular (LV) pacing sites. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between such changes and acute hemodynamic response (AHR). METHODS: Two EH metrics-standard deviation of activation times and mean left thorax activation times-were computed from isochronal maps based on 53-electrode body surface mapping during baseline AAI pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing from different pacing sites in coronary veins in 40 cardiac resynchronization therapy-indicated patients. AHR at different sites was evaluated by invasive measurement of LV-dp/dtmax at baseline and BiV pacing, along with right ventricular (RV)-LV sensing delays and QRS duration. RESULTS: The site with the greatest combined reduction in standard deviation of activation times and left thorax activation times from baseline to BiV pacing was hemodynamically optimal (defined by AHR equal to, or within 5% of, the largest dp/dt response) in 35 of 40 patients (88%). Sites with the longest RV-LV and narrowest paced QRS were hemodynamically optimal in 26 of 40 patients (65%) and 28 of 40 patients (70%), respectively. EH metrics from isochronal maps had much better accuracy (sensitivity 90%, specificity 80%) for identifying hemodynamically responsive sites (∆LV dp/dtmax ≥10%) compared with RV-LV delay (69%, 85%) or paced QRS reduction (52%, 76%). Multivariate prediction model based on EH metrics showed significant correlation (R2 = 0.53, P <.001) between predicted and measured AHR. CONCLUSION: Changes in EH from baseline to BiV pacing more accurately identified hemodynamically optimal sites than RV-LV delays or paced QRS shortening. Optimization of LV lead location by minimizing EH during BiV pacing, based on body surface mapping, may improve CRT response.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]