These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Kinematic strategies and sensorimotor transformations in the wiping movements of frogs.
    Author: Giszter SF, McIntyre J, Bizzi E.
    Journal: J Neurophysiol; 1989 Sep; 62(3):750-67. PubMed ID: 2788719.
    Abstract:
    1. Spinal frogs are known to make coordinated and successful wiping movements to almost all places on the body and legs. Such wiping movements involve a sensorimotor transformation. Information from both the spatial locations of stimuli on the skin and the body configuration of the frog is transformed into a set of motor commands that generate body movements adequate to successfully remove the irritant. The spinal cord itself therefore has a limited capacity for sensorimotor transformations. 2. We examined the kinematics of wiping motions in both spinal and intact leopard frogs and bullfrogs. This data was used to assess the flexibility, precision, and strategy of the kinematic sensorimotor transformations used during wiping. The movements involved the use of redundant degrees of freedom in the limbs. Thus many possible movements or solutions could generate successful wiping. This redundancy allows motor-equivalent movements to be used by the frog. 3. Movements were examined in two dimensions by the use of VHS shuttered-video recording and in three dimensions with the use of a WATSMART system of infrared diodes and cameras. The kinematic analysis was applied to those motions in which the limbs did not interact with kinematic constraints, such as the surface of the substrate or body. These unconstrained motions are directly related to motor commands and thus more easily interpreted. 4. Wiping movements to the back were retained in essentially the same form in both spinal and intact frogs. In both cases wiping had four phases with a fifth occasionally present. The phases included flexion, placing, aiming, and whisking, with occasional extension and multiply repeated wipes. However, the aiming phase was often very brief or absent in this data, and flexion was sometimes omitted in multiple wipes. We found that the placing posture was adjusted in a simple way in response to variations in the location of the target stimulus. The rostrocaudal position of the foot tip was strongly and linearly related to the rostrocaudal stimulus location. 5. During the placing posture, joint angles as well as the limb tip in back wipes had linear relationships to the stimulus' rostrocaudal coordinate. The limb configuration used by the frog allowed a strategy of linear (and potentially independent) postural adjustment of joint angle to stimulus position to generate almost linear endpoint adjustments in the placing phase of wiping. This solution to the ill-posed problem of choosing a joint angle for the placing posture in back-wiping may be computationally simple.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]