These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The application of conscious sedation with a small dose of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing multiple intestinal polyps resection].
    Author: Shi CM, Zhou YD, Xu M, Wang XD, Meng LM, Liu XJ, Guo XY.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov 22; 96(43):3474-3478. PubMed ID: 27903341.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To explore the effectiveness and feasibility of conscious sedation with a low dose of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil during multiple intestinal polyps resection in elderly patients. Methods: Sixty elderly patients who underwent multiple intestinal polyps resection in Peking University Third Hospital from Janurary to May 2016 were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group (D group, n=30) and propofol group (P group, n=30). There were 28 males and 32 females with a mean age of (70.4±4.5) years old (range: 65-80 years old). The patients in the dexmedetomidine group received a loading dose of 0.3 μg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-0.4 μg·kg-1·min-1 of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg) respectively.The patients in the propofol group received sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg and propofol 1.5 mg/kg and followed by a continuous infusion of 3-6 mg·kg-1·h-1 of propofol.Blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at the basic status and at the beginning of operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation, the end of operation and departure.The observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scores and the clinical responses were also recorded.A statistical analysis was performed. Results: All patients in the two groups were sedated compared with baseline.The BIS values of patients in group D at beginning of the operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation were 89.6(87.8-91.0), 79.4(78.0-80.0), 76.9(75.0-80.0), 76.0(73.0-79.0) and 75.6(70.0-79.0) respectively, and those values were all significantly lower than baseline value[96.4(95.0-98.0)], (Z=-4.645, -4.788, -4.787, -4.789, -4.789, P<0.05). The OAA/S score at beginning of the operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation were 4.5(4.0-5.0), 3.4(3.0-4.0), 3.0(3.0-3.0), 3.5(3.0-4.0) and 3.3(3.0-4.0) respectively, and were significantly lower than baseline score [4.8(5.0-5.0)] (Z=-2.828, -4.862, -5.031, -4.420, -4.710, P<0.05). The BIS value of patients in group P at beginning of the operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation were 54.7(50.0-59.3), 54.8(50.0-59.3), 50.7(47.8-56.8), 54.4(51.5-58.0) and 53.7(50.0-57.3) respectively, and were significantly lower than baseline value[95.8(95.0-96.3)] (Z=-4.786, -4.787, -4.788, -4.786, -4.786, P<0.05). The OAA/S score at beginning of the operation , 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation were 0.4(0.0-1.0), 0.4(0.0-1.0), 0.4(0.0-1.0), 0.4(0.0-1.0) and 0.4(0.0-1.0) respectively, and were significantly lower than baseline score[4.9(5.0-5.0)] (Z=-4.927, -4.901, -4.912, -4.912, -4.901, P<0.05). The sedation state of group D were lighter than group P. The BIS value and OAA/S score at beginning of the operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation in group D were higher than group P (P<0.05). The breath and circulation were more stable in group D. The mean arterial pressure, breath rate and SpO2 at beginning of the operation, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after operation and the end of operation in group D were higher than group P (P<0.05). There was no oxygen desaturation , hypotension and drowsiness in group D and the incidence in group P were 30.0%, 33.3% and 13.3% respectively.The emergency time and duration of stay in the PACU (post anesthesia care unit) were (2.0±1.2) and (22.0±7.4) min in group D, and they were (4.9±2.4) and (35.8±11.6) min in group P (t=-5.839, t=-5.472, P<0.05). There was no difference in surgery time, patient satisfaction and acceptance rate of reexamination (t=-3.031, t=-7.322, t=2.069, P>0.05). Conclusion: Conscious sedation with dexmedetomidine and sufentanil is effective and feasible in elderly patients undergoing multiple intestinal polyps resection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]