These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Converting Scoliosis Research Society-24 to Scoliosis Research Society-22r in a Surgical-Range, Medical/Interventional Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patient Cohort.
    Author: Chen AF, Bi W, Singhabahu D, Londino J, Hohl J, Ward M, Ward WT.
    Journal: Spine Deform; 2013 Mar; 1(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 27927426.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire administration study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability to translate total and domain scores from Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-24 to SRS-22r in a surgical-range, medical/interventional adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patient population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conversion of SRS-24 to SRS-22r is demonstrated in an operative cohort of patients with AIS, but not in a medical/interventional patient population. METHODS: We simultaneously administered SRS-24 and SRS-22r questionnaires to 75 surgical-range, medical/interventional AIS patients and compared them. We performed analysis by regression modeling to produce conversion equations from SRS-24 to SRS-22r. RESULTS: The total SRS-24 score for these medical/interventional AIS patients was 92.5 ± 9.45 (mean, 3.9 ± 0.39), and the total SRS-22r score was 93.5 ± 9.63 (mean, 4.3 ± 0.44). The correlation between these 2 groups was fair (R2 = 0.77) and improved to good when mental health or recall questions were removed. The correlation was also fair for total pain domains (R2 = 0.73). However, there was poor correlation for general self-image (R2 = 0.6) and unacceptable for post-treatment self-image (R2 = 0.01), general function (R2 = 0.52), activity function (R2 = 0.56), and satisfaction (R2 = 0.53). Compared with a published population of operative AIS patients, R2 values for total SRS-24 scores, pain, general self-image, activity function, and satisfaction were similar (p > .05). The R2 values for general function and combined general and activity function were significantly different between the operative and medical/interventional cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Scoliosis Research Society-24 can be converted to SRS-22r scores with fair accuracy in the surgical-range, medical/interventional AIS patient population for total score, and total pain domains. The SRS-24 translates unacceptably to the SRS-22r in self-image, function, and satisfaction domains. The SRS-24 to SRS-22r conversion equations are similar to operative AIS patients, except for the function domain. Caution should be used when interpreting results based on translation of SRS-24 to SRS-22r values.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]