These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.
    Author: Chan J, Heath M.
    Journal: Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28070622.
    Abstract:
    Relative visual information has been shown to mediate grasping responses directed to an area previously occupied by a target object (i.e., pantomime-grasping) and is an information type functionally distinct from the absolute visual information supporting naturalistic grasping (i.e., grasping a physical target). Pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ not only in terms of their visual properties, but also because the former lacks physical interaction with a target object (i.e., no-haptic feedback). The absence of haptic feedback may represent a reason why pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ. To address this issue, participants completed pantomime-grasps to objects embedded in fins-in and fins-out configurations of the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion following a 2000-ms visual delay when haptic feedback was unavailable (H- condition), and when experimentally induced (H+ condition). In particular, in the H+ condition the experimenter placed a physical target object between participants' thumb and forefinger after they completed their grasping response. H- and H+ conditions were performed when online vision was available (i.e., Experiment 1) and when withdrawn (i.e., Experiment 2). If haptic feedback influences grasping, then the absolute information afforded from physically touching a target object (i.e., the H+ condition) should result in aperture metrics that are refractory-or attenuated-to the relative properties of the ML figures. Grip apertures in H- and H+ conditions were "tricked" in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the ML illusion; however, Experiment 2 showed that illusory effects were attenuated in the H+ condition. In other words, responses without online vision showed evidence of a visuo-haptic calibration. These results provide convergent evidence that haptic and visual feedback play a salient role in considering the extant literature's documented report of kinematic differences between pantomime- and naturalistic grasps.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]