These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Development and validation of a predictor of insufficient enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Author: Cui E, Long W, Luo L, Hu M, Huang L, Chen X.
    Journal: Acta Radiol; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1174-1181. PubMed ID: 28090793.
    Abstract:
    Background Insufficient enhancement of liver parenchyma negatively affects diagnostic accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Currently, there is no reliable method for predicting insufficient enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Purpose To develop a predictor for insufficient enhancement of liver parenchyma during HBP in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Material and Methods In order to formulate a HBP enhancement test (HBP-ET), clinical factors associated with relative enhancement ratio (RER) of liver parenchyma were retrospectively determined from the datasets of 156 patients (Development group) who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI between November 2012 and May 2015. The independent clinical factors were identified by Pearson's correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis; the performance of HBP-ET was compared to Child-Pugh score (CPS), Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (MELD), and total bilirubin (TBIL) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The datasets of 52 patients (Validation group), which were examined between June 2015 and Oct 2015, were applied to validate the HBP-ET. Results Six biochemical parameters independently influenced RER and were used to develop HBP-ET. The mean HBP-ET score of patients with insufficient enhancement was significantly higher than that of patients with sufficient enhancement ( P < 0.001) in both the Development and Validation groups. HBP-ET (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.895) had better performance in predicting insufficient enhancement than CPS (AUC = 0.707), MELD (AUC = 0.798), and TBIL (AUC = 0.729). Conclusion The HBP-ET is more accurate than routine indicators in predicting insufficient enhancement during HBP, which is valuable to aid clinical decisions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]