These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Nurses' Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge.
    Author: Hagedorn Wonder A, McNelis AM, Spurlock D, Ironside PM, Lancaster S, Davis CR, Gainey M, Verwers N.
    Journal: J Contin Educ Nurs; 2017 Feb 01; 48(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 28135379.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: This study provides a first-time, objective assessment of the evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge of RNs working in Magnet®-designated hospitals. METHOD: This multisite, cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study uses the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN) and Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ). RESULTS: EBPQ subscale scores revealed overall positive self-ratings of EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/use. EKAN sum scores were not correlated with EBPQ scores (r = .017 to .123, p = not significant). Higher levels of nursing education were associated with higher scores on EKAN and were the only statistically significant predictor of EKAN scores. CONCLUSION: Nurses' self-reported EBP knowledge/skills, attitudes, and practice/use were not statistically significantly correlated with objectively measured EBP knowledge. Direct, objective measurement is recommended as the standard when testing interventions aimed at advancing EBP knowledge, skills, and ability. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2017;48(2):65-70.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]