These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Parametric response mapping on chest computed tomography associates with clinical and functional parameters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Author: Pompe E, Galbán CJ, Ross BD, Koenderman L, Ten Hacken NH, Postma DS, van den Berge M, de Jong PA, Lammers JJ, Mohamed Hoesein FA.
    Journal: Respir Med; 2017 Feb; 123():48-55. PubMed ID: 28137496.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In the search for specific phenotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) computed tomography (CT) derived Parametric Response Mapping (PRM) has been introduced. This study evaluates the association between PRM and currently available biomarkers of disease severity in COPD. METHODS: Smokers with and without COPD were characterized based on questionnaires, pulmonary function tests, body plethysmography, and low-dose chest CT scanning. PRM was used to calculate the amount of emphysema (PRMEmph) and non-emphysematous air trapping (i.e. functional small airway disease, PRMfSAD). PRM was first compared with other biomarkers for emphysema (Perc15) and air trapping (E/I-ratioMLD). Consequently, linear regression models were utilized to study associations of PRM measurements with clinical parameters. RESULTS: 166 participants were included with a mean ± SD age of 50.5 ± 17.7 years. Both PRMEmph and PRMfSAD were more strongly correlated with lung function parameters as compared to Perc15 and E/I-ratioMLD. PRMEmph and PRMfSAD were higher in COPD participants than non-COPD participants (14.0% vs. 1.1%, and 31.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively, both p < 0.001) and increased with increasing GOLD stage (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that PRMfSAD was mainly associated with total lung capacity (TLC) (β = -7.90, p < 0.001), alveolar volume (VA) (β = 7.79, p < 0.001), and residual volume (β = 6.78, p < 0.001), whilst PRMEmph was primarily associated with Kco (β = 8.95, p < 0.001), VA (β = -6.21, p < 0.001), and TLC (β = 6.20, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PRM strongly associates with the presence and severity of COPD. PRM therefore appears to be a valuable tool in differentiating COPD phenotypes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]