These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns.
    Author: Preis V, Hahnel S, Behr M, Bein L, Rosentritt M.
    Journal: Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):427-433. PubMed ID: 28185678.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fatigue and fracture resistance of different CAD/CAM-materials as implant- or tooth-supported molar crowns with respect to the clinical procedure (screwed/bonded restoration). METHODS: 168 crowns were fabricated from different CAD/CAM-materials (n=8/material): ZLS (zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic; Suprinity, Vita-Zahnfabrik), COB (composite; Brilliant Crios, Coltene), COL (composite; Lava Ultimate, 3M Espe), PMV/PPV (polyether ether ketone (PEEK)+milled composite veneer/composite paste veneer; BioHPP+HIPC veneer/Crealign veneer, Bredent), COH (composite; Block HC, Shofu), and ZIR (zirconia; IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent) as reference. Three groups were designed simulating the following clinical procedures: (a) chairside procedure ([CHAIR] implant crown bonded to abutment), (b) labside procedure ([LAB] abutment and implant crown bonded in laboratory, screwed chairside), and (c) reference ([TOOTH] crowns bonded on human teeth). Combined thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML) were performed simulating a 5-year clinical situation. Fracture force was determined and failures were documented. Data were statistically analyzed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov-test, one-way-ANOVA; post-hoc-Bonferroni, α=0.05). RESULTS: All crowns of group LAB-PPV showed cracks after TCML. The other groups survived fatigue testing without failures. Fracture forces varied between 921.3N (PPV) and 4817.8N (ZIR) [CHAIR], 978.0N (COH) and 5081.4N (ZIR) [LAB], 746.7N (PPV) and 3313.5N (ZIR) [TOOTH]. Significantly (p<0.05) different fracture values were found between materials in all three groups. Only ZLS crowns provided no significant (p>0.05) differences between the individual groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Different ceramic and resin-based materials partly performed differently in implant or tooth situations. Individual resin-based materials (PPV, COB, COH) were weakened by inserting a screw channel. Most CAD/CAM-materials may be clinically applied in implant-supported crowns without restrictions. ​.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]