These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Effect of molar ligation and local Porphyromonas gingivalis inoculation on alveolar bone loss in the mouse].
    Author: Gao L, Yu XQ, Cai Y.
    Journal: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb 18; 49(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 28203000.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent and time course of alveolar bone loss and osteoclast activation in two murine models of periodontal disease: molar ligation and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) oral inoculation. METHODS: A split-mouth design was applied to two groups of mice (C57BL6, 6-8 weeks old, n=24 in both groups), resulting in four treatment groups: (1) Control group: unligated upper right 2nd molars receiving CMC only, (2)Ligature group: ligation of a 9-0 suture around the upper left 2nd molar, (3) P. gingivalis group: unligated upper right 2nd molar receiving P. gingivalis challenge only, (4)Ligature+P.gingivalis group: ligation of the upper left 2nd molar in combination with oral inoculation with 109 colony-forming units(CFU) P. gingivalis. Alveolar bone loss was measured as the cementoenamel junction and alveolar bone crest (CEJ-ABC) distance. In the study, 48 C57BL6 mice were designed and treated as described above, and osteoclasts were counted on histological sections following tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and counts were normalized to alveolar bone surface distance. Then 36 C57BL6 mice were investigated, of which 30 were ligated a 9-0 silk ligature around the 2nd molar in the left maxillary quadrant and 6 were not ligated. After ligation for 1 week, the ligatures in 12 mice were taken off for either 1 week or 2 weeks. The CEJ-ABC distance of the 6 mice without ligation was baseline. The CEJ-ABC distances were measured and analyzed. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Molar ligation induced marked alveolar bone loss after 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks [(0.16±0.04) mm, (0.16±0.02) mm, (0.18±0.03) mm, (0.17±0.02) mm], vs. corresponding controls [(0.09±0.03)mm,(0.10±0.01)mm,(0.12±0.04)mm,(0.12±0.01)mm] and P. gingivalis group [(0.09±0.03)mm, (0.12±0.01)mm,(0.12±0.02)mm,(0.10±0.01)mm], P<0.05. Combined treatment with molar ligation and P. gingivalis did not further increase the CEJ-ABC distance. Evidence for osteoclast activation was found one day after molar ligation, and TRAP-positive cell numbers peaked on day 3 (12±4 vs. control 2±2, P<0.01). After taking off ligature following ligation for 2 weeks, it showed significantly regrowth of alveolar bone compared with that before removal of the ligature on day 7 [(0.07±0.02)mm vs. (0.13±0.01)mm, P<0.01]. CONCLUSION: Molar ligation is a rapid and effective way to induce periodontal bone loss in mice. Osteoclast activation occurs within 24 hours of ligature placement, and the extent of bone loss well exceeds that of the P.gingivalis-induced bone loss. Removing ligature after periodontal disease might help bone regeneration by regrowth of the alveolar bone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]