MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: [Clinical application of Acutegastrointestinal injury grading system assocaited with clinical severity outcome in critically ill patients: a multi-center prospective, observational study].
Author: Hu BC, Sun RH, Wu AP, Ni Y, Liu JQ, Ying LJ, Xu QP, Ge GP, Shi YC, Liu CW, Xu L, Lin RH, Jiang RL, Lu J, Zhu YN, Wu WD, Ding XJ, Xie B.
Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb 07; 97(5):325-331. PubMed ID: 28219187.
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the feasibility of utilizing the current acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI) grading system, and explore the association of severity of AGI grade with clinical outcome in critically ill patients. Methods: The adult patients from 14 general ICUs in Zhejiang Province with an expected admission to ICU for at least 24 h were recruited, and all clinical, laboratory, and survival data were prospectively collected. The AGI grade was daily assessed based on GIsymptoms, feeding details and organ dysfunctionon the first week of admission to ICU.The intra-abdominal pressures(IAP) was measured using AbViser device. Results: Of 550 patients enrolled, mean values for age and APACHE Ⅱ score were (64.9±17.2) years and (19.5±7.4), respectively. 456 patients(82.9%) took mechanical ventilation, and 470 patients were identified for AGI. The distribution of AGI grade on the frist day of ICU admission were 50.6%(Ⅰ grade, n=238), 34.2%(Ⅱ grade, n=161), 12.4%(Ⅲ grade, n=58) and 2.8%(Ⅳ, n=13), respectively, while the distribution of the global AGI grade based on the 7-day AGI assessment of ICU admission were 24.5%(Ⅰ grade, n=115), 49.4%(Ⅱ grade, n=232), 20.6%(Ⅲ grade, n=97) and 5.5%(Ⅳ, n=26), respectively. 28- and 60-day mortality rate was 29.3%(n=161) and 32.5%(n=179), respectively. The patients with AGI had a higher 28-(31.1% vs 18.8%, P=0.025) and 60-day survival rate(34.7% vs 20.0%, P=0.01) than those with non-AGI, and also there were positive correlations between AGI grade and 28- and 60-day mortality(P<0.001). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, the source of medicial admission, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, the use of vasoactive drugs, serum creatinine and lactate, mechanical ventilation, APACHE Ⅱ score, the AGI grade in the first day of ICU admission and feeding intolerance within the first week of ICU stay were significantly(P≤0.02) associated with mortality. In multivariate analysis including all these variables, the source of medical admission(χ(2)=4.34, P=0.04), diabete mellitus(χ(2)=3.96, P=0.05), the use of vasoactive drugs(χ(2)=6.55, P=0.01), serum lactate(χ(2)=4.73, P=0.03), the global AGI grade in the 7-day of ICU admission(χ(2)=7.10, P=0.008), and APACHE Ⅱ score(χ(2)=12.1, P<0.001) remained independent predictors for 60-day mortality.In the further subgroup analysis including 402 patients with 7-day survival, the feeding intolerance within the first week of ICU stay could provide independent and incremental prognostic value of 60-day mortality wtih increased χ(2)value of Cox regression model(χ(2)=52.2 vs 41.9, P=0.007) . Conclusion: The AGI grading system is useful for identifying the severity of gastrointestinal dysfunction, and could be used as a strong predictor of impaired outcome. The results provide evidence to support that feeding intolerance within 7 days of admission to ICU was an independent determinant of mortality. 目的： 观察急性胃肠损伤(AGI)分级系统在重症医学科(ICU)患者中临床应用可行性和AGI严重程度对临床预后的评估意义。 方法： 2014年3至8月在浙江省14个综合医院ICU内连续招募550例预期入住ICU>24 h的患者，前瞻性采集患者临床、实验室和生存数据，患者入ICU后第1周每日进行胃肠道症状、肠内喂养状况以及合并器官功能障碍评估，采用AbViser系统测定腹腔内压(IAP)，综合评估患者AGI分级。 结果： 入选患者平均年龄为(64.9±17.2)岁；APACHE Ⅱ评分为(19.5±7.4)分，456例(82.9%)患者接受机械通气治疗；470例患者发生AGI，其中，入ICU第1天AGI分级分别为50.6%(Ⅰ级，n＝238)，34.2%(Ⅱ级，n＝161)，12.4%(Ⅲ级，n＝58)和2.8%(Ⅳ级，n＝13)，而综合患者ICU 7 d内最高AGI分级分别为24.5%(Ⅰ级，n＝115)，49.4%(Ⅱ级，n＝232)，20.6%(Ⅲ级，n＝97)和5.5%(Ⅳ级，n＝26)；28 d和60 d病死率分别为29.3%和32.5%。与非AGI患者相比，AGI患者28 d(31.1% 比18.8%，P＝0.025)和60 d病死率(34.7% 比20.0%，P＝0.01)显著增加，AGI分级严重程度与患者28 d和60 d病死风险增加呈显著正相关。单因素Cox回归分析示：年龄、入ICU内科来源、脓毒症、2型糖尿病、冠心病，缩血管药物使用、血乳酸和肌酐、接受机械通气、入ICU综合AGI分级和APACHE Ⅱ评分与60 d病死预后显著相关(P≤0.02)；多因素Cox回归分析示：ICU内科来源(χ(2)＝4.34，P＝0.04)、2型糖尿病(χ(2)＝3.96，P＝0.015)、血管活性药物使用(χ(2)＝6.55，P＝0.01)、血乳酸(χ(2)＝4.73，P＝0.03)、入ICU综合AGI分级(χ(2)＝7.10，P＝0.008)和APACHE Ⅱ评分(χ(2)＝12.1，P<0.001)是预测重症患者60 d病死独立危险因素。此外，402例7 d存活患者亚组分析显示：在入ICU第1天AGI分级和临床因素预测死亡的基础上，7 d喂养不耐受能提供独立额外地预测其60 d病死价值(χ(2)＝52.2与41.9, P＝0.007)。 结论： AGI分级系统能有效识别重症患者胃肠功能障碍严重程度，并能预测其临床预后；本研究证据支持入ICU 7 d内喂养不耐受是死亡风险独立危险因素。.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]