These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The Effects of Cognitive Rehabilitation on Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.
    Author: Güçlü Altun İ, Kirbaş D, Altun DU, Soysal A, Sütlaş PN, Yandim Kuşçu D, Behrem Gayir N, Arslan E, Topçular B.
    Journal: Noro Psikiyatr Ars; 2015 Jun; 52(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 28360700.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to determine the severity of cognitive impairment with Brief Repeatable Battery Neuropsychology (BRB-N) and to show the benefits of cognitive rehabilitation programs to develop coping strategies for the retardation of cognitive losses in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. METHODS: The cognitive screening with BRB-N was performed in RRMS patients who had applied to the MS outpatient clinic of Bakırköy Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases Hospital, had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 1.0 and 5.5, and had no other cognitive disease or used drugs that effected the cognitive status. Thirty two patients with cognitive impairment underwent consecutive computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation program once a week for 8 weeks conducted by psychologists. The effects of the program were evaluated with the tests repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 36.09±7.19 years. Their initial and control test scores were found to be paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) 29.21±17.97; 42.43±15.43, Selective Reminding Test-Total Learning (SRT-TL) 8.03±2.36; 10.09±1.77, Selective Reminding Test-Long-term Memory (SRT-DR) 6.72±2.74; 9±2.29, Spatial Recall Test-Total Learning (SPART-TL) 4.72±2.02; 4.22±1.74, Spatial Recall Test-Long-term Memory (SPART-DR) 5.94±2.54; 5.16±2.23, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) 40.44±17.04; 46.47±17.94, Word Fluency Test (WLG) 32.88±9.87; 40.44±9.95 respectively. There was no significant statistical difference between Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ) and SPART values of preface, 1st control and 2nd control (p>0.05). There was significant statistical difference between PASAT, WLG, SDMT, SRT-TL, SRT-DR values of Preface, 1st control, and 2nd control (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: It was determined that on distinctive improvement on sustaining attention, working memory and information processing speed, and verbal fluency and verbal learning with cognitive rehabilitation, no changes were observed on visuospatial learning. This approach is hopeful and further comprehensive studies are needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]