These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Clinical usefulness of controlled attenuation parameter to screen hepatic steatosis for potential donor of living donor liver transplant. Author: Hong YM, Yoon KT, Cho M, Chu CW, Rhu JH, Yang KH, Lee JW. Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 29(7):805-810. PubMed ID: 28379854. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Hepatic steatosis is associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Although the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), a process based on transient elastography, has been suggested as a noninvasive method of assessing hepatic steatosis, to date, there is no study on the usefulness of CAP as a single screening tool for detecting hepatic steatosis in potential living donor liver. We evaluated the accuracy of CAP for detecting hepatic steatosis in potential liver donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All potential donors of living-donor liver transplantation who underwent a CAP assessment and ultrasonography-guided liver biopsy were enrolled. The steatosis grades were as follows: S0 less than 5%; S1, 5-33%; S2, 34-66%; and S3, more than 66%. RESULTS: According to the liver biopsies, 19 (34.5%) patients had S0, 30 (54.5%) patients had S1, and 6 (11.0%) patients had S2. The CAP value was correlated positively with BMI (r=0.242, P=0.01), waist circumference (r=0.268, P=0.006), hip circumference (r=0.334, P=0.001), Magnetic resonance fat signal fraction (r=0.465, P=0.001), and histologic steatosis grade (r=0.542, P=0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the diagnosis of steatosis (≥S2) by CAP was 0.88 (sensitivity 83.3% and specificity 81.6% at a cutoff value of 276 dB/m, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CAP, as a simple and noninvasive preoperative assessment for hepatic steatosis, may be sufficient for identifying and thus excluding significant hepatic steatosis (>33%) in potential liver donors.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]