These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of methodologies to assess muscle co-contraction during gait.
    Author: Souissi H, Zory R, Bredin J, Gerus P.
    Journal: J Biomech; 2017 May 24; 57():141-145. PubMed ID: 28433389.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to compare co-contraction index (CCI) computed from muscle moments to different co-activation indexes (Co-Act) derived from EMG data at the ankle and the knee joint during gait. An EMG-driven model was used to estimate muscle moments during over-ground walking gait at a self-selected velocity from twelve healthy subjects. The CCI calculated from muscle moments was compared with three Co-Acts estimated from the normalized EMG data. The co-activation methods produced lower values than the CCI during the first double-support and the swing phase at the ankle joint and during the stance phase at the knee joint. The co-activation methods trend is to underestimate the simultaneous action of agonist and antagonist contraction. Because the EMG-driven model included the muscle mechanical properties (e.g. force-length-velocity relationship) and muscle moment-arm, the co-contraction based on major agonist and antagonist muscle moment may provide a more confident description of muscle action compared to co-activation indexes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]