These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fine-tuned evaluation of olfactory function in patients operated for nasal polyposis.
    Author: Sonnet MH, Nguyen DT, Nguyen-Thi PL, Arous F, Jankowski R, Rumeau C.
    Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 274(7):2837-2843. PubMed ID: 28447155.
    Abstract:
    Given the forced-choice procedure of the identification test, patients with profound anosmia are more likely to have higher identification scores by chance than patients with hyposmia or normosmia. This may be a confusing factor when assessing the sense of smell, which alters the appreciation of real olfaction improvement. The aim of this study was to fine-tune the results of the identification Sniffin' Sticks test before and 6 weeks after surgery using the real identification score. A total of 133 patients underwent the Identification (I) and Threshold (T) tests the day before and 6 weeks after nasalization surgery. The scores of the identification test, called I G (global identification), were ranked from 0 to 16. Patients had to specify if their forced-choice answers were given either surely or randomly, called I H (hazard identification). The real score of identification I R was obtained as follow: I R = I G - I H. Patients with an immeasurable threshold according to the T test were more prone to give randomly correct answers. On the basis of I G scores, 43.6% of patients remained hypo-anosmic after surgery compared to 72.9% before surgery. Using I R scores, only 3.8% of patients remained anosmic (I R = 0) at 6 weeks after surgery. Hence, patients with real anosmia (I R = 0) were less prone to improve their olfaction than patients with I R > 0. The analysis of random factor when using identification test allows differentiating a real anosmia from a hyposmia. An I G ≤ 4 could be considered as a profound/real anosmia or a severe hyposmia. This procedure cannot, however, replace the forced-choice method in odor identification testing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]