These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of Direct Current Synchronized Cardioversion to Ibutilide-Guided Catheter Ablation for Long-Term Sinus Rhythm Maintenance After Isolated Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
    Author: Wang M, Zhao Q, Ding W, Cai S.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jun 15; 119(12):1997-2002. PubMed ID: 28501100.
    Abstract:
    Use of the antiarrhythmic ibutilide after isolated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) might distinguish atrial remodeling severity and cases requiring further substrate modification, thereby improving efficacy of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Ninety-six consecutive patients with persistent AF were randomized after PVI to either direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC group, n = 48) or 1 mg of intravenous ibutilide (ibutilide group, n = 48) followed by no further intervention if AF converted to sinus rhythm (SR) within 30 minutes (ibutilide conversion subgroup) or by complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation until SR recovery or complete CFAE elimination (ibutilide nonconversion subgroup). With similarly distributed baseline characteristics and no serious postablation complications, the primary end point of 12-month SR maintenance rate after PVI was significantly higher for ibutilide versus the DCC group before (75% vs 56%; p = 0.042) or after (83% vs 60%; p = 0.011) reablation at physician's discretion for recurrence beyond 3 months after PVI. After ibutilide administration, 21 of 48 patients (44%) converted to SR at 17 ± 8 minutes (mean ± SD); those in the ibutilide nonconversion subgroup had larger atrial size (47 ± 4 vs 45 ± 4; p = 0.025) and CFAE area (29 ± 8 vs 12 ± 5; p = 0.001) and longer AF duration (27 ± 6 vs 21 ± 10; p = 0.026). Among ibutilide conversion and nonconversion subgroups and DCC group, procedure, ablation, and x-ray exposure times differed significantly, as did 12-month SR maintenance rate before (81% vs 70% vs 56%; p = 0.043) or after reablation (86% vs 81% vs 60%; p = 0.042). In conclusion, in persistent AF treatment, ibutilide-guided ablation after PVI yields higher 1-year SR maintenance rate than PVI only.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]