These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Usefulness of the Mitral Regurgitation Severity Index to Assess the Severity of Chronic Mitral Regurgitation. Author: Afonso L, Shokr M, Akintoye E, Briasoulis A, Alesh I, Alani A, Mahajan N, Veeranna V, Mostafa A, Zmily H, Telila T, Zalawadiya S. Journal: Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jul 15; 120(2):304-308. PubMed ID: 28550931. Abstract: Existing metrics for grading mitral regurgitation (MR) are limited and fraught with high interobserver variability. We developed and evaluated a Doppler-based, semiquantitative novel index (Mitral Regurgitation Severity Index [MRSI]) of MR severity. In a total of 125 patients (70 in the derivation cohort and 55 in the validation cohort), MRSI was calculated as a ratio of time velocity integral of mitral inflow (continuous-wave Doppler-TVI MV) to the time velocity integral of the left ventricle outflow (pulse-wave Doppler-TVI LVOT). Inter-rater agreement for MRSI and predictive ability of the MRSI were then assessed. In the derivation cohort, MRSI differed significantly between patients with severe MR (2.6 ± 0.51) and mild-moderate (nonsevere) MR (1.4 ± 0.18) and a cutoff of ≥1.8 was associated with optimal diagnostic accuracy. In the validation cohort, MRSI exhibited excellent agreement between a level II and a level III reader with a mean difference of -0.14 (95% confidence limit of agreement: -0.80 to 0.53), correlation coefficient of 0.88 (p <0.001), and 16% CV; and using the cut point of 1.8, it exhibited good inter-rater reproducibility with a kappa coefficient of 0.72 (p <0.001). In conclusion, MRSI appears to be a simple, quantitative, practical, color-independent metric to differentiate severe MR from nonsevere MR.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]