These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Proper reprogramming of imprinted and non-imprinted genes in cloned cattle gametogenesis.
    Author: Kaneda M, Watanabe S, Akagi S, Inaba Y, Geshi M, Nagai T.
    Journal: Anim Sci J; 2017 Nov; 88(11):1678-1685. PubMed ID: 28574624.
    Abstract:
    Epigenetic abnormalities in cloned animals are caused by incomplete reprogramming of the donor nucleus during the nuclear transfer step (first reprogramming). However, during the second reprogramming step that occurs only in the germline cells, epigenetic errors not corrected during the first step are repaired. Consequently, epigenetic abnormalities in the somatic cells of cloned animals should be erased in their spermatozoa or oocytes. This is supported by the fact that offspring from cloned animals do not exhibit defects at birth or during postnatal development. To test this hypothesis in cloned cattle, we compared the DNA methylation level of two imprinted genes (H19 and PEG3) and three non-imprinted genes (XIST, OCT4 and NANOG) and two repetitive elements (Satellite I and Satellite II) in blood and sperm DNAs from cloned and non-cloned bulls. We found no differences between cloned and non-cloned bulls. We also analyzed the DNA methylation levels of four repetitive elements (Satellite I, Satellite II, Alpha-satellite and Art2) in oocytes recovered from cloned and non-cloned cows. Again, no significant differences were observed between clones and non-clones. These results suggested that imprinted and non-imprinted genes and repetitive elements were properly reprogramed during gametogenesis in cloned cattle; therefore, they contributed to the soundness of cloned cattle offspring.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]