These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic performance of 18 fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting T1-T2 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Author: Chaput A, Robin P, Podeur F, Ollivier M, Keromnes N, Tissot V, Nonent M, Salaün PY, Rousset J, Abgral R.
    Journal: Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 28600822.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18 fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect T1-T2 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with histologically proven T1-T2 HNSCC were prospectively included. All patients underwent pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT and MRI. Two nuclear medicine physicians and 2 radiologists blindly reviewed all FDG-PET/CT and MRI, respectively. A five-point qualitative scale was used to estimate tumor detection ability. Sensitivity of each modality was compared together using a McNemar test. Interobserver variability was assessed by kappa index (κ) of Cohen statistics. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVMAX ), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in FDG-PET/CT, and gadolinium enhancement (%GE) in MRI of each tumor were recorded and compared with T stage using a Mann-Whitney test. Tumor-to-normal tissue ratios in FDG-PET/CT and MRI (TNRPET and TNRMRI ) were calculated and compared together using a Student t test. RESULTS: Among the 35 primary tumors, 29 were detected by FDG-PET/CT and 22 by MRI. MRI detected none of the six lesions incorrectly identified by FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT correctly identified seven of the 13 MRI false-negative results. Sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT to detect T1-T2 HNSCC was significantly higher than MRI (83% vs. 63%, P = .015). T stage was significantly correlated with MTV (P = .002) unlike with SUVMAX (P = .06) and %GE (P = .70). TNRPET was significantly higher than TNRMRI (3.5 ± 3.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a higher diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT than MRI to detect T1-T2 HNSCC with a good interobserver agreement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:378-385, 2018.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]