These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effectiveness of long-term vortioxetine treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.
    Author: Vieta E, Loft H, Florea I.
    Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):877-884. PubMed ID: 28693903.
    Abstract:
    To investigate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in patients treated at therapeutic doses (5-20mg/day) for both acute and maintenance treatment, patient-level data were pooled from 5 long-term (52-week), open-label extension studies of major depressive disorder. The mean (±standard deviation) MADRS total score improved from 17.1±10.2 at the start of maintenance therapy to 7.6±8.2 (observed cases [OC]) or 10.3±9.9 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at week 52. The mean HAM-A total scores improved from 11.3±6.9 to 6.0±6.0 (OC) or 7.5±6.7 (LOCF) and the mean CGI-S score improved from 3.11±1.20 to 1.94±1.08 (OC) or 2.27±1.26 (LOCF) at week 52. Response and remission rates increased over time. At week 52, the total response rate was 75.4% (n=916/1215, LOCF) and the total remission rate was 60.7% (n=738/1215, LOCF). There were no differences in effectiveness as assessed by MADRS total scores at week 52 in subgroups based on gender, age (<55 vs ≥55 years), baseline HAM-A total score (<20 vs ≥20), baseline MADRS total score (<30 vs ≥30), previous major depressive episodes (MDEs) (<3 vs ≥3) or current MDE duration (<6 vs ≥6 months) at the start of the lead-in studies, or response status (≥50% decrease in MADRS total score during the lead-in study). The most commonly reported adverse event during the maintenance period was nausea.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]