These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [The value of B7-H4 and carcinoembryonic antigen in diagnosing the benign and malignant pleural effusion]. Author: Wei F, Wei Y, Li LF, Li GL, Wang GJ. Journal: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jul 23; 39(7):524-527. PubMed ID: 28728299. Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the value of combined detection of negative costimulatory molecule B7-H4 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in diagnosing malignant and benign pleural effusion. Methods: Ninety-seven pleural effusion specimen were collected, 55 of which were diagnosed as malignant pleural effusion and 42 were benign pleural effusion. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) was used to examine the concentration of B7-H4 and CEA in pleural effusion. Electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay was used to detect the CEA level in pleural effusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was established to analyze and evaluate the single or combined detection of B7-H4 and CEA in diagnosing malignant and benign pleural effusion. Results: The concentrations of B7-H4 and CEA in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) group were (60.08±35.04) ng/ml and (41.49±37.16) ng/ml, respectively, obviously higher than (27.26±9.55) ng/ml and (2.41±0.94) ng/ml of benign pleural effusion (BPE) group (both P<0.01). Area under curve (AUC) of B7-H4 was 0.884 in MPE groupand the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 81.8% and 90.5%, respectively, at the optimized cut off value of 37.25 ng/ml. Likewise, area under curve (AUC) of CEA was 0.954 and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.3% and 95.2%, respectively, at the cut off value of 4.18 ng/ml. When B7-H4 >37.25 ng/ml or CEA>4.18 ng/ml, the sensitivity of diagnosis as MPE was down-regulated to 90.9% and the specificity was elevated to 88.1%. When B7-H4 >37.25 ng/ml and CEA>4.18 ng/ml, the sensitivity of diagnosis as MPE was down-regulated to 78.2% and the specificity was elevated to 97.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of combined detection of B7-H4 and CEA to diagnose MPE were elevated to 90.9% and 97.6%, respectively. The level of B7-H4 in MPE and BPE were both positively correlated with CEA (r=0.670, P=0.001 in MPE and r=0.002, P=0.001 in BEP). Conclusions: B7-H4 is a potential tumor marker in diagnosing the benign and malignant pleural effusion. Although the diagnostic value of B7-H4 may not precede to CEA, the combined detection of B7-H4 and CEA can improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MPE. 目的: 探讨B7-H4和癌胚抗原(CEA)联合检测鉴别诊断良、恶性胸腔积液的价值。 方法: 收集97例胸腔积液标本,其中恶性胸腔积液55例,良性胸腔积液42例。采用酶联免疫吸附法检测B7-H4水平,采用电化学发光法检测CEA水平,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价B7-H4、CEA和B7-H4联合CEA检测对良、恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值。 结果: 恶性胸腔积液组和良性胸腔积液组患者的B7-H4水平分别为(60.08±35.04 )ng/ml和(27.26±9.55)ng/ml,CEA水平分别为(41.49±37.16 )ng/ml和(2.41±0.94)ng/ml,两组患者的B7-H4和CEA水平差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。B7-H4诊断恶性胸腔积液的ROC曲线下面积为0.884,最佳诊断临界值为37.25 ng/ml,敏感度和特异度分别为81.8%和90.5%。CEA诊断恶性胸腔积液的ROC曲线下面积为0.954,最佳诊断临界值为4.18 ng/ml,敏感度和特异度分别为87.3%和95.2%。B7-H4和CEA并联检测,即B7-H4>37.25 ng/ml或CEA>4.18 ng/ml时,则为恶性胸腔积液,其敏感度可提高至90.9%,特异度降低至88.1%;B7-H4和CEA串联检测,即B7-H4>37.25 ng/ml且CEA>4.18 ng/ml时,则为恶性胸腔积液,其敏感度降低至78.2%,特异度提高至97.6%。B7-H4和CEA联合检测时,敏感度和特异度可分别提高至90.9%和97.6%。恶性胸腔积液中B7-H4与CEA水平呈正相关(r=0.670,P=0.001),良性胸腔积液中B7-H4与CEA水平呈正相关(r=0.002,P=0.001)。 结论: B7-H4可鉴别诊断良、恶性胸腔积液,但诊断效能未优于CEA。B7-H4和CEA联合检测可提高诊断恶性胸腔积液的敏感度和特异度。.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]