These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography.
    Author: Wang L, Su Y, Wang Q, Duanmu Y, Yang M, Yi C, Cheng X.
    Journal: Sci Rep; 2017 Jul 24; 7(1):6284. PubMed ID: 28740145.
    Abstract:
    Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4-6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53-0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96-0.99. A Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]