These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Respiratory muscle endurance training reduces the O2 cost of cycling and perceived exertion in obese adolescents.
    Author: Salvadego D, Sartorio A, Agosti F, Tringali G, Patrizi A, Isola M, LoMauro A, Aliverti A, Grassi B.
    Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2017 Oct 01; 313(4):R487-R495. PubMed ID: 28747408.
    Abstract:
    In obesity, the increased O2 cost of breathing negatively affects the O2 cost of exercise and exercise tolerance. The purpose of the study was to determine whether, in obese adolescents, the addition of respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) (isocapnic hyperpnea) to a standard body mass reduction program decreases the O2 cost of exercise and perceived exertion. Nine male obese adolescents [16.0 ± 1.4 yr (x ± SD), body mass 114.4 ± 22.3 kg] underwent 3 wk of RMET (5 days/week) in addition to a standard body mass reduction program. Eight age- and sex-matched obese adolescents underwent only the standard program (CTRL). Before and after interventions, patients performed on a cycle ergometer: incremental exercise; 12-min exercises at a constant work rate (CWR) of 65% and 120% at the gas exchange threshold (GET) determined before the intervention. Breath-by-breath pulmonary ventilation (V̇e) and O2 uptake (V̇o2), heart rate (HR), and ratings of perceived exertion for dyspnea/respiratory discomfort (RPER) and leg effort (RPEL) were determined. Body mass decreased (by ~3.0 kg) after both RMET (P = 0.003) and CTRL (P = 0.002). Peak V̇o2 was not affected by both interventions. Peak work rate was slightly, but significantly (P = 0.04), greater after RMET but not after CTRL. During CWR < GET, no changes were observed after both interventions. During CWR > GET, the O2 cost of cycling at the end of exercise (P = 0.02), the slope of V̇o2 vs. time (3-12 min) (P = 0.01), RPER (P = 0.01), and RPEL (P = 0.01) decreased following RMET, but not following CTRL. HR decreased after both RMET (P = 0.02) and CTRL (P = 0.03), whereas V̇e did not change. In obese adolescents RMET, superimposed on a standard body mass reduction program, lowered the O2 cost of cycling and perceived exertion during constant heavy-intensity exercise.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]