These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cardiac magnetic resonance-aided scar dechanneling: Influence on acute and long-term outcomes.
    Author: Andreu D, Penela D, Acosta J, Fernández-Armenta J, Perea RJ, Soto-Iglesias D, de Caralt TM, Ortiz-Perez JT, Prat-González S, Borràs R, Guasch E, Tolosana JM, Mont L, Berruezo A.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1121-1128. PubMed ID: 28760258.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) provides tissue characterization of ventricular myocardium and scar that can be depicted as pixel signal intensity (PSI) maps. OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible benefit of guiding the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate mapping by integrating these PSI maps into the navigation system. METHODS: In total, 159 consecutive patients (66 ± 11 years old, 151 men [95%]) with scar-related left ventricular (LV) VT were included. VT substrate ablation used the scar dechanneling technique. A CMR-aided ablation using the PSI maps was performed in 54 patients (34%). Procedural data as well as acute and long-term outcomes were compared with those of the remaining 105 patients (66%). RESULTS: Mean procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were 229 ± 67 minutes and 20 ± 9 minutes, respectively, without significant differences between groups. Both the number of radiofrequency (RF) applications and RF delivery time were lower in the CMR-aided group (28 ± 18 applications vs 36 ± 18 applications, P = .037, and 19 ± 12 minutes vs 27 ± 16 minutes, P = .009, respectively). After substrate ablation, monomorphic VT inducibility was lower in the CMR-aided than in the control group (17 [32%] vs 53 [51%] patients, P = .022). After a mean follow-up period of 20 ± 19 months, patients from the CMR-aided group had a lower recurrence rate than those in the control group (10 patients [18.5%] vs 46 patients [43.8%], respectively, P = .002; log-rank P = .017). Multivariate analysis found that CMR-aided ablation (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% Confirdence Interval (CI) 0.24-0.96], P = .037) was an independent predictor of recurrences. CONCLUSION: CMR-aided scar dechanneling is associated with a lower need for RF delivery, higher noninducibility rates after substrate ablation, and a higher VT-recurrence-free survival.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]