These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Midterm Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Liver Tumors Located Close to Major Portal or Hepatic Veins.
    Author: Distelmaier M, Barabasch A, Heil P, Kraemer NA, Isfort P, Keil S, Kuhl CK, Bruners P.
    Journal: Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):1023-1031. PubMed ID: 28799842.
    Abstract:
    Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in the treatment of hepatic tumors not suitable for thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation [RFA] or microwave ablation). Materials and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved prospective study in 29 patients (15 men, 14 women; mean age, 63 years ± 12 [standard deviation]) with 43 primary (n = 8) or secondary (n = 35) malignant liver tumors who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided IRE. All target tumors were located immediately adjacent to major hepatic veins, portal veins, or both; thus, they were not considered suitable for RFA or microwave ablation. Patients underwent postinterventional CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Systematic follow-up MR imaging was performed for 24 months on average to assess complete ablation, intrahepatic tumor recurrence, and complications. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for the rate of bile duct strictures, incomplete ablation, and tumor recurrence. Results Complete ablation was achieved in 40 (93%; 95% CI: 85, 100) of 43 target tumors, with a safety margin of 5-10 mm, and was confirmed at immediate postinterventional CT and MR imaging. In 13 (33%; 95% CI: 18, 47) of 40 completely ablated tumors, intrahepatic tumor recurrence was observed at 2-18 months. However, only two (15%; 95% CI: 0, 35) of these 13 tumors were observed within the ablation zone. In the remaining 11 (85%; 95% CI: 65, 100), tumor growth was observed alongside the needle tract. None of the two true local recurrences occurred at the site of the vessel. All adjacent vessels remained perfused at follow-up. Five (24%; 95% CI: 5, 39) of 21 patients with target tumors adjacent to portal veins developed mild to moderate cholestasis 2-6 weeks after IRE. Conclusion IRE is useful to avoid incomplete ablation secondary to heat-sink effects and damage to major blood vessels; however, needle tract seeding is observed in 26% of treated tumors, and IRE induces sufficient local heating to bile ducts in 24% of ablations. © RSNA, 2017.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]