These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differential effect of growth factors on growth stimulation and phenotypic stability of glutamine-synthetase-positive and -negative hepatocytes in primary culture.
    Author: Gebhardt R, Cruise J, Houck KA, Luetteke NC, Novotny A, Thaler F, Michalopoulos GK.
    Journal: Differentiation; 1986; 33(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 2880778.
    Abstract:
    In rat liver parenchyma, two subpopulations of hepatocytes can be distinguished by the absence or presence of the marker enzyme, glutamine synthetase (GS). Hepatocytes in the perivenous zone immediately adjacent to the hepatic venules in the liver acinus are positive for GS. Using autoradiography in combination with immunocytochemistry, the response of these two hepatocyte populations (GS positive and GS negative) to a variety of growth factors (defined compounds or complex stimuli) was investigated in vitro. Irrespective of the individual growth-promoting activity (which varied considerably), all stimuli led to much higher labeling indices in GS-negative cells as compared to GS-positive cells. In GS-negative cells, the strongest effect was exerted by serum obtained from partially hepatectomized rats (labeling index, 67%) and the conditioned media of JM1 and JM2 hepatoma cells (63%-82%), followed by a combination of insulin and either norepinephrine (46%) or epidermal growth factor (EGF; 42%). In contrast, serum had the weakest influence on GS-positive cells (0.3%), while the other potent stimuli enhanced the labeling index of these cells by between 6% and 15% within 48 h. The percentage of labeled nuclei was higher in mononucleated than in binucleated GS-positive hepatocytes. The time course of thymidine incorporation was also different for the two subpopulations. Under all growth-promoting conditions, the stimulation of GS-negative cells peaked between 72 and 96 h, while it increased continuously in GS-positive cells for at least 120 h, particularly in the case of serum. In proliferating cultures, both the absolute and the relative number of GS-positive hepatocytes decreased, while no such effect was found in various nonproliferating control cultures maintained at low and high cell density. Similar results were found for GS activity. In contrast, the hormonal induction of tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) was not affected. It is suggested that these differences in the growth response of GS-positive and -negative cells contribute to the acinar gradient in hepatocyte proliferation that occurs during liver regeneration. Furthermore, the striking phenotypic instability of GS-positive cells that have undergone DNA synthesis and mitosis supports the hypothesis that cellular reprogramming depends on passage through the cell cycle.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]