These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Changing relation between home and clinic blood-pressure measurements: do home measurements predict clinic hypertension?
    Author: Padfield PL, Lindsay BA, McLaren JA, Pirie A, Rademaker M.
    Journal: Lancet; 1987 Aug 08; 2(8554):322-4. PubMed ID: 2886776.
    Abstract:
    Blood-pressure screening in a family health centre identified 114 patients (53 male, 61 female) with diastolic pressures of 95 mm Hg and greater after three readings in the seated position (mean 163 [SEM 2]/104 mm Hg). All were instructed in the use of the 'Copal UA 231/251' electronic sphygmomanometer and produced a series of readings taken at home over 3 days. They were recalled after 2 weeks and 4 weeks for repeat clinic measurements of blood pressure. Blood pressure fell on successive clinic visits; at the final visit only 59 patients (31 male, 28 female) had diastolic pressures of 95 mm Hg or greater. Average day-time home blood-pressure measurements (155/94 mm Hg) were significantly lower than the screening blood-pressure measurements but were not significantly different from those at the third clinic visit (154/97 mm Hg). Home blood-pressure measurements were successful in predicting outcome at the third clinic visit in 90 (79%) patients; home-monitored pressures suggested normotension when the final clinic visit diastolic blood pressure was still above 95 mm Hg in only 16 (14%) patients. Only 2 of these had a final clinic diastolic pressure above 105 mm Hg. Home monitoring represents a practicable and acceptable alternative to repeated clinic measurements in the initial assessment of hypertensive patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]