These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prospective observational study of single- or multi-compartment pressure ulcer prevention cushions: PRESCAROH project.
    Author: Meaume S, Marty M, Colin D.
    Journal: J Wound Care; 2017 Sep 02; 26(9):537-544. PubMed ID: 28880757.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: In patients with reduced mobility, specialised pressure-relieving supports (mattresses, beds and cushions) are widely used to reduce or relieve the interface pressure between the skin and support surfaces to prevent incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs). The primary objective of these two observational studies was to assess the incidence of PUs in patients at high risk of PUs, seated in a wheelchair using a single- or multi-compartment air cushion. The level of patient satisfaction with the comfort and the views of the care team that used the air cushions were considered as secondary objectives. METHOD: The PRESCAROH project was two prospective observational studies conducted in patients free of PUs at baseline and at high risk of PUs (Braden score ≤13 or ≤16 for people with spinal cord injury). Patients had to spend more than eight hours a day in a wheelchair and use either a single-compartment air cushion (patient without asymmetry of support) for the first study or a multi-compartment air cushion (patient with asymmetry of support) for the second study. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in whom a PU (sacrum and/or ischium) developed over a 35-day period. The analysis was performed on the full-analysis set (FAS) of patients included with at least a second assessment. RESULTS: We recruited 152 patients, 78 seated on a single-compartment air cushion (SiCAC group) and 74 on a multi-compartment air cushion (MuCAC group), in the two independent studies. All patients were included in the FAS (n=152). Most patients had spinal cord injuries. The average time spent sitting was 10.2 (standard deviation (SD): 2.3) hours a day in the SiCAC group and 9.1 (SD: 1.9) hours a day in the MuCAC group. In the SiCAC group, 6.4% (5/78) of patients dropped out of the study (one patient because of pulmonary infection and four patients for cushion installation problems). In the MuCAC group, 8.1% (6/74) of patients dropped out of the study (three patients because of adverse events not related to cushions, two for onset of PU, one for cushion-related problem). Over the study period of 35 days, 2.6% (2/78) [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-9.0%] of patients in the SiCAC group and 4.0% (3/74) [95%CI: 0.8-11.4%] in the MuCAC group developed a PU. CONCLUSION: These two observational studies showed that in patients at high risk of PUs and seated for more than eight hours a day in a wheelchair, the use of a single-compartment or multi-compartment air cushion with telescopic cells was associated with a low incidence of PUs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]