These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection accuracy of Renibacterium salmoninarum in Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum) from non-lethally collected samples: Effects of exposure route and disease severity.
    Author: Richards CA, Murphy CA, Brenden TO, Loch TP, Faisal M.
    Journal: Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep 15; 145():110-120. PubMed ID: 28903867.
    Abstract:
    Bacterial kidney disease (BKD), caused by Renibacterium salmoninarum, threatens salmonid populations throughout the Northern hemisphere. Many fishery regulatory authorities require ongoing disease monitoring in hatcheries and spawning runs prior to gamete collection to prevent BKD outbreaks and spread. According to diagnostic protocols of the American Fisheries Society-Fish Health Section, monitoring for R. salmoninarum generally consists of lethal sampling of visceral organs from fish. However, non-lethal sampling would be preferable, especially for valuable broodstock or endangered species. In this study, non-lethal sampling methods were evaluated for their ability to detect R. salmoninarum in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) that were experimentally infected via two different routes (e.g., intraperitoneal injection and waterborne immersion) to mimic acute and chronic disease courses. Non-lethal (e.g., blood, mucus, and a urine/feces mixture) and lethal (e.g., kidney and spleen homogenate) samples were collected from challenged and mock-challenged Chinook salmon and the presence of R. salmoninarum was assessed by culture on modified kidney disease medium, nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), and semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of lethal and non-lethal samples in detecting R. salmoninarum were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. For ROC analyses, true disease status was evaluated under two different assumptions: 1) that lethal samples represented the true disease status and 2) that all experimentally challenged fish were truly infected. We found that sensitivity and specificity of non-lethal samples depended upon time of sampling after experimental infection, sample type, and R. salmoninarum exposure route. Uro-fecal samples had the greatest potential as non-lethal samples compared to mucus and blood. In terms of future monitoring, combining lethal samples tested by ELISA assay with uro-fecal samples tested by nPCR could be the best strategy for detecting R. salmoninarum prevalence in a population as it reduces the overall number of fish required for sampling.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]